new Gradient logo*********PGHQ logo*******Digifly logo

Melbourne - Australia       ABN 65406279846
WEBSITE FOR PARAGLIDER PILOTS WHO KNOW WHAT THEY WANT

 

Gradient | Digifly | HGFA | Skyhigh Paragliding Club | Paragliding Repair Centre | Outdoor Inn | Paragliding Forum |Paragliding Earth |                                        | Contact us |

Welcome to the "Watch out" page!

Disclaimer:

This page keeps you informed about some interesting topics and safety issues in the PG world. The information is being collected mostly from discussion groups and presented "as it is". Don't regard it as official. Please, verify any information from other sources before taking any actions.

 


11.10.10
A fatality possibly linked to design of the locking mechanism of a harness allowing pilot to clip instrument panel in before closing leg straps (T-bar). http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/paraglider-killed-in-crash-20101007-1692y.html . If you have this kind of setup, consider the modification described here: http://www.paraglidingheadquarters.com/articles.html#Useful_technical_solutions .

 

02.09.08
Nova RA lines problem
  http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=124993#124993

19.08.08
Safety notice issued 6 August 2008: Please check your harness for potential buckle malfunction. Certain Sup'Air and Gin harnesses are affected.

19.07.08

From Paraglidng Forum:

We've been seeing a large number of Peak and IcePeak line problems at our site lately. The problem isn't catastrophic, but there were 8 nearly identical instances. Specifically, brake lines are unsheathing, stabilo lines are wearing, and in two cases, breaking.
We are wondering if anyone else is experiencing this.
During June and early July, 4 IcePeaks and 4 Peaks had this problem at our local site. Damage occurs just 6-10" above the mallions/pulleys. It appears that the brake line pulleys aren't turning, but also that the brake lines wear against the stabilos.
Niviuk hasn't had any other reports of this. They are wondering if it is something about our launch. If you have similar experience, please post.
Thanks,
Paul Murdoch

09.06.08

Manufacturer’s Safety Notice
Sup’Air Altix and Evo XC harnesses
Reserve deployment issue
It has come to our attention that a small number of pilots have experienced difficulty
in deploying their reserve parachutes during test deployments using Sup'Air AltiX and
Evo XC harnesses (later designs).
The white nylon braided cord attached to the deployment pins has become entangled
between the velcro flaps over time, making the force required to release the pins
excessive. We recommend all owners of these harnesses to check their system and
ensure that this cord does not run between the velcro flaps.
Alternative solutions of masking the male velcro side or sleeving the cord have also
been used effectively. We advise all pilots to check their pins and ensure that the
braided cord is not trapped by the velcro at least two or three times per season.

03.06.08

Forum: Safety and Incidents in flight   Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:21 am   Subject: RE: Forgetting to Strap In: Survival Strategies

Very sad news from a friend of mine who did a SIV training this week-end. Another student of the SIV clinic (not my friend) forgot to attach the leg straps at launch. He flew above the lake, hoping to hold lon enough but fell from 200m height and died. Be carefull especially when you know you are stressed (new tricks learning etc ...)

 

01.05.08

Problems with reserve extractors in Supair harnesses:

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=17675 

 

12.03.08

Structural integrity issue with some Apco gliders: http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=104533&highlight=&sid=26354e8d7596e43cf8a902a808d690a2#104533

 

08/09/07
New safety notes on the DHV website:
Paratech
On brake handles of type Paratech <Evolution> the brake swivels on a number of Paratech gliders have sharp edges in the drilled holes. This can cause wear on the brake loop.

This concerns the following models delivered after 1st of May 2007:
Paratech PBi5 M DHV GS-01-1363-05,
Paratech PBi5 S DHV GS-01-1408-05,
Paratech P44 XS DHV GS-01-1490-06,
Paratech P44 SM DHV GS-01-1491-06,
Paratech P44 ML DHV GS-01-1492-06,
Paratech P44 L DHV GS-01-1493-06,
Paratech P27 XS DHV GS-01-1651-07,
Paratech P27 SM DHV GS-01-1652-07,
Paratech P27 ML DHV GS-01-1653-07,
Paratech P27 L DHV GS-01-1654-07.

If wear is visible, the handle should be changed right away. If no wear is visible, the handles can be used until a replacement pair is obtained. They should however be checked before every flight. Pilots can replace the brake handles themselves. Concerned pilots should contact Paratech.
 
Gradient
On all Gradient paragliders, the mallions connecting line to risers are not secured with thread glue or similar. Due to this, it is possible that the mallions may loosen or open during usage. In agreement with the DHV, the general importer Turnpoint GmbH has issued the following safety advisory:
All mallions connecting lines to risers on Gradient paragliders must be checked to ensure they are correctly closed before the next flight. Loose mallions may be hand-tightened by using a spanner or pair of pliers.

More info:
DHV Equipment Database


Forum: Safety and Incidents in flight Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:43 pm Subject: Airworthiness advisory - Paraglider Nova Ra M
From DHV webpage : http://www.dhv.de/DHVonlineDB/source/technicdatareportnotes.php?lang=EN&templatesetid=-1&su...

Airworthiness advisory
Paraglider Nova Ra M DHV GS-01-1571-06

During check flights conducted by the DHV on 16th June 2007, irregularities in the flight characteristics of a Nova RA M were revealed that are not present in the DHV test example of this paraglider. It has been determined that incorrect trimming of the paraglider with incorrect line lengths are the reason for this behavior. A check of production data for the RA made by Nova has shown that several paragliders in this series, constructed between January and April 2007, have been sold with incorrect trimming, not as set in the DHV test example. The serial numbers of these gliders are:

35395, 35359, 35406, 35356, 35402, 35290, 35601, 35613, 35240, 35239, 35284, 35355, 35484, 35510, 35297, 35238, 35407, 35232, 35360, 35584, 35233, 35421, 35610, 35596, 35277, 35511, 35545, 35237, 35597, 35514, 35608, 35276, 35361, 35593, 35245, 35590, 35587, 35639, 35282, 35423, 35542, 35540, 35422, 35549, 35452, 35242, 35405, 35585, 35358, 35539, 35615, 35546, 35673, 35228, 35244, 35353, 35646, 35641, 35614, 35515, 35536, 35583, 35197, 35543, 35553, 35279, 35453, 35229, 35541, 35547, 35588, 35289, 35629, 35586, 35605, 35672, 35538, 35420, 35404, 35604, 35594, 35235, 35591, 35616, 35805, 35600, 35592, 35548, 35513, 35295, 35357, 35230, 35125, 35054, 35140, 35129, 35720, 35122, 35157, 35138, 35165, 35053, 35159, 35136, 35123, 35124, 35130

Nova have contacted the purchasers of the above canopies on 2nd May 2007, with details on the necessity of a correction to the trimming. As it has become clear that not all owners have either corrected the trimming differences, or been contacted by Nova.
In agreement with Nova, the DHV has issued the following safety notice:
The above listed paragliders must have their trimming corrected before they may be flown again. Some of the above paragliders may be corrected by their owners, others must be returned to Nova. All owners of Nova RAs with the above listed serial numbers should immediately contact Nova for details on their particular paraglider. The above listed paragliders may not be flown until the trimming has been corrected. Should the corrections contained in the safety notice issued by Nova on 2nd May 2007 already have been applied, then these paragliders are not referred to in this notice. Nova offer all owners of RA M paragliders a free trimming check, which is independent of this safety notice.

Nova Vertriebs GmbH
Bernd-Höfel-Str. 14
A- 6020 Innsbruck
Phone: 0043-512-361340
Fax: 0043-512-361342
www.nova-wings.com
info@nova-wings.com

Gmund, 17.06.07

Klaus Tänzler
Managing Director, DHV

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paragliding Forum 20.06.07:

 

Hi,
just to clarify a couple of points on re-testing:
the DHV completed a set of post tests about a year ago, where production gliders were purchased anonymously, put through a full set of certification flight tests, re-measured and checked for materials and construction details - in other words the full certification program. The full results were publicised in the DHV-Info magazine, where everyone could come to their own conclusions on which manufacturer was doing the "best" job.
Internally, we were pleasantly surprised at the DHV on how closely all manufacturers were keeping to the test-examples of their gliders: we were expecting much larger differences, but this was not the case.
In some instances, minor differences were found in line lengths and construction details when the production gliders were compared to the test examples kept by the DHV, but in no cases were the changes relevant for the certification classification - the flight tests were all positive. As a result, the manufacturers of these gliders were notified (and in some cases shocked!) of the changes, and documented them appropriately for the DHV.
In the case of the RA the story is a little different: here, one of the employees of the DHV (an experienced pilot) changed from his Nova Tattoo to a Nova RA this year, but had a found the wing was front stalling more often than expected in rough air. The DHV were also contacted by another RA pilot (this time an ex-constructor, also with plenty of experience), and decided to examine the production wings. Whenever the DHV is contacted by pilots worried that something is wrong with their glider, this information is taken very seriously and often leads to re-checking or re-testing of production canopies. The flight tests indicated something was wrong, so the next step was to check the geometry of the canopy. Here the differences in trim were revealed. Nova were informed of the findings and further extensive tests were conducted together with the Nova test pilots to see what could be done about the problem. Of course it's a difficult situation, the DHV doesn't want to put anyone out of business by grounding paragliders and forcing re-calls, but the DHV does want to put pilots first, and put their safety interests first. Together with Nova, an initial Airworthiness Advisory was released, and Nova began trying to contact all the RA pilots with details of what to do. Sadly, developments showed that not all pilots were informed of the problems, so the DHV released a second advisory (together with Nova) to try and help solve the problem. Tolerances:
Generally, the science of "aero-elastics" is still very incomplete, so tolerances on one element of a paraglider (such as lines) may in some cases be very relevant to flying characteristics, whereas with a different design where perhaps the profile, leading edge tension, billow or a number of other factors can compensate for this, it may not be critical at all.
The DHV works closely with manufacturers to set reasonable tolerance levels for construction, but appreciates that a certain range is very necessary to produce gliders which should be flyable over a number of years. For example: a new glider is often trimmed somewhat faster than the optimum, as with usage, the A and B lines which take most of the load, tend to stretch. It a play-off between having a faster, newer glider or one which is initially trimmed correctly, and after usage begins to get slower and stall more easily. The two year check to retain certification is an important instrument for regulating this, in an ideal world everyone will check their glider, and every check would reveal the differences in trim.

Cheers,

Peter
DHV-Technical dept.

 


 

A problem concerning Sup Air harnesses with a carbon-fibber seat plate: the plate has sharp edges and tends to cut thru the structural webbing. More details here: www.supair.com/fr/content/communique_abrasion_gb.pdf  

Also problems with reserve deployment in Ava Sport - Sprinter harness.


A serious accident in Bulgaria caused by a structural failure of Apco Lambada glider http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=36055#36055 . Some more pictures and comments (in Bulgarian ;-)) here: http://paraplan.ru/forum/viewpost.php?p=208747 . One of the points to be noticed here: There is a certain way lines to be looped together. Doing it wrong may not pay off.

 


06.10.05

A number of problems concerning reserve containers in some harnesses has surfaced recently. DHV has issued safety notices banning or restricting use of certain types in Germany.

http://www.dhv.de/DHVonlineDB/sourcelegacy/legacynotespage.php?sublang=EN
 
http://www.dhv.de/DHVonlineDB/sourcelegacy/legacynoteslist.php?lang=EN

 


22.06.05

A top German pilot Norman Lausch was killed in an accident in Switzerland during a test flight a few days ago. During a spiral dive he got totally separated from the canopy at about 200m AGL. Reserve wasn't deployed.

A preliminary investigation suggests, the reason for all the main lines breakage were knots the pilot used for test-trimming the glider.

 

aerodynamic helmets
IP: 144.139.15.59
Posted on 16/3/2005 at 04:48:39 PM by Jiri


aerodynamic helmet

I've been leading quite a crusade against this type of helmets - the risk of a neck injury grossly overweights the "aerodynamics" benefits (if there are any). Last weekend at Corryong I was present to an accident, where this type of helmet was likely to kill if involved. Look at the photos - you get goose bumps. The "classic" type of helmet the pilot was wearing has cracked under the impact (falling flat on his back after a low-height stall) but has done its job. The guy suffered only a mild concussion. Now, imagine what would have happened to his neck if he was wearing the type of helmet pictured on the right. YUCK!
 


Airworthiness advisory

Paraglider harness, harnesscarabiner Parafly Automatic from AustriAlpin

After several fractures of aluminium harnesscarabiner Parafly Automatic from AustriAlpin during use in 2003 and 2004, the manufacturer was asked to prove fatigue strength against vibration. The last deadline was 1. March 2005. This proof has not been shown up today. Tests conducted in the order of DHV to aluminium harnesscarabiner Parafly Automatic from AustriAlpin showed low values of fatigue strength against vibration. The in flight safety is gravely affected. The DHV has decided on the following precautionary safety measure:
All harness carabiners Parafly Automatic by Austrialpin, must not be used any more. The airworthiness instruction comes into effect with the publishing of the NFGH (Paraglider and Hanglider news). Gmund, 09.03.2005

Klaus Tänzler

Managing Director

 


 

Apco Fiesta 2 Safety Notice


DHV Warning: Lines on all UP gliders


DHV warning: FreeX tow release


Another fatality due to open leg straps...

 


Aluminium Fittings
Something to be beware off: I took this picture recently after witnessing a failure of an aluminium buckle (chest strap) on an about 10 years old harness. The pilot  landed safely. Close inspection revealed extensive corrosion of the aluminium part inside the webbing loop. The harness has been used mostly at the coast... Watch out!

coroded bracket


There is concern is about the combination of "pocket" type of reserve containers used by Woody Valley, Gradient, Gin  and a number of other manufacturers with some types of inner bags.
It is imperative the extractor handle would be attached to the SIDE of the inner reserve bag and inserted in the "pocket" with this side towards the opening. If attached to the centre of the inner bag or inserted any other way, the reserve can roll during extraction and get stuck in the pocket.
Some inner bags have a choice of attachment points (later models of Sky reserves). If there is only one point in the middle of the bag available, the bag has to be modified should it be used with the above type of harnesses.
So far there were no accidents recorded due to this problems, but difficulties with extraction have been reported in a couple of cases. Please, check your setup and make sure you have it right. Contact me, if you need more details.

Another fatality after glider structural failure during acro


Another commercial tandem fatality in Oludenig


Structural failure of a paraglider


Another fatality involving undone leg straps...


Just in case you are wondering what happened to Firebird...


Double fatality in Turkey


 

Date: May 17, 2004 10:55 AM
Author: Jérôme Daoust
Subject: Safety notice
Airbule harness with bottom reserve

Thanks to Gerard Florit (Para2000) for raising the issue. Translation I made ...

All equipment with reserve parachute under the seat board.

Airbulle harness "Powertop", "Tiptop", "Tandem", etc...

During test in a gymnasium on 2004/4/15 by the "Arcs en ciel de Voreppe" association, on reserve equippment, during a normal extraction force on the reserve, the link from the handle to the contained (Pod) broke.

A recent fatal accident seems linked to this issue.

Test the strength of your gear !

Contact your reseller or :

Airbulle
Z.A. l'atterrissage
38660 Lumbin -France
Tel. : +33/(0) 476.082.626
Fax : +33/(0) 476.082.959
E-mail : airbulle@parapente.fr
Web : http://www.parapente.fr/

 


HELMETS  The ICARUS helmet in the first entry is not identical with Icaro Skyrunner being sold by us.


Big Ears and collapses discussion


Flying on the beach discussion


DHV Warning: Weakened lines
DHV : All gliders from Advance, Gin Gliders, Ozone, Paratech, Flugsportservice Skyward, Sol, Swing, XIX

All Gliders from,
ADVANCE Thun AG,
Gin Gliders Inc.,
OZONE Gliders Ltd.,
Paratech AG,
Flugsportservice Skyward,
Sol Sports Ind. E Comèrico LTDA,
Swing Flugsportgeräte GmbH,
XIX GmbH.

At routine canopy re-examinations and the checking of canopies which have been involved in accidents, it has been observed that after ageing, the breaking strengths of Aramid lines in the upper galleries can diminish faster than the breaking strengths of the main lines.

As a preventative safety measure the following must be adhered to:

At re-examination sample Aramid lines from all galleries and the main lines must be subjected to breaking strength testing.

The following limits are to be used:

The total calculated strength (N) of all A & B lines using the worst case sample results, must not be less than 8 times the maximum certified take-off mass of the canopy (kg) the total calculated strengths for all other lines, must not be less than 6 times the maximum take-off mass. Additionally, the manufacturer must record the minimum breaking strength (N) of all line materials used.

These measures must be implemented at the next re-examination of a canopy.

ADVANCE Thun AG, Rolf Zeltner
Gin Gliders Inc., Gin Seok Song
OZONE Gliders Ltd., David Dagault
Paratech AG, Uwe Bernholz
Flugsportservice Skyward, Eugen Stiebritz
Sol Sports Ind. E Comèrico LTDA, Ary Pradi
Swing Flugsportgeräte GmbH, Guenther Woerl
XIX GmbH, Michi Kobler


DHV warning: Faulty harness.

There is information in German on the DHV website, but until the English version is available here is the Info from UP.


Accident: USA: WA: Chelan: 1/5/2004

Safety Notice to the DHV 26.02.2003 

Swing - Paraglider - Mistral 2.22

The following safety notice relates only to the SWING Mistral 2.22 glider.

It has come to the attention of SWING that there have been occasional incidents when this model has shown an increased tendency to deep stall in certain situations. All gliders sent to us for inspection came within the permissible tolerance levels. Nor did these gliders differ in any other respects from the sample provided to DHV.

We are therefore asking all Mistral 2.22 – pilots to take extra care when using their gliders, particularly in the situations described in (a) to (d) below.

All equipment which has been affected so far shows the following unusual behaviour:

1) Deteriorating launch behaviour
2) Stable deep stall, especially when "big ears" are used
3) Poor transition to normal flight after a B stall
4) Shorter braking distance

The following factors can contribute to the tendency to deep stall and were found in almost all cases brought to our attention:

(a) Weather conditions with high air density
(b) Dry air conditions
(c) Flying where the temperature is around or less than 0° C.
(d) Take-off weight is at the lower end of the weight range
(e) On "big ears"

Causes

Gliders generally come close to the stall limit in the situations above ((a) to (d)) since in these cases drag values increase greatly. It appears that a pilot could go beyond this stall limit on the Mistral 2.22 in unfavourable conditions.

Materials not at fault:

The problem cannot be put down to defects in the materials (e.g. increased air permeability) since newer gliders with good air permeability values are also affected.

Safety Check

The advice to pilots which is given below on how to check their gliders was determined in agreement with the DHV and should be carried out before the next flight. Further investigations should only be carried out by Swing.

Procedure:

Determine whether the Mistral 2.22 shows any tendency to hang back when launched on a level training area in still conditions (not a reverse launch). This should be tried at least five times before reaching any conclusion. If it is clear that its launch behaviour is poor or if there are any other peculiarities, the glider should not be flown and SWING should be contacted.

Swing Tel: +49 (0) 8141 3 27 78 88

Reminder: tips on what to do in a deep stall:

- Don't apply too much brake
- Consider using the speed system
- Consider pulling down the A-risers

Best wishes

The Swing Team


Airworthiness advisory

Paraglider emergency parachute RS 2 DHV GS-02-0032-91

In an emergency equipment inner container of the type RS 2 while releasing the rescue chute by applying usual force on the handle, the loop where the release handle is fixed was ripped of. The reason for this rupture was a to weak performed seam of the release handle attachment loop. Picture:

In agreement with Firebird Sky Sport AG, the DHV decided on the following safety measures as a precaution:

1. The inner container for all emergency equipment of the type RS 2 must be rechecked
2. Faulty inner containers must be exchanged.This airworthiness instruction comes into force when it is published in the News for Paragliders and Hang Gliders (NfGH). The precautionary safety measure must be carried out before the equipment is flown again.  Checks and exchange will be carried out by the company Firebird Sky Sport AG, Schäfflerstr. 15, 87629 Füssen, Tel: 08362/9832-0, Fax: 08362/9832-19, E-Mail: firebirdag@gmx.net, Internet: www.flyfirebird.com

Gmund, 26.03.2004
Klaus Tänzler
Managing Director